North Dakota · Bakken spacing units · November 2026

Room to drill

How much infill drilling do the Bakken's spacing units still hold? This page counts the laterals that still fit in each of the 10,572 Bakken spacing units at the well density its own neighbourhood has already reached, draws them into the gaps between the existing wells, and adds them up by county, township and operator. It is a geometric count from public records: not a forecast, not a plan, and not yet an economic judgment.

Wells and surveys DMR GIS of October 17, 2026Orders signed through October 21, 2026Computed November 8, 2026

Headline numbers

Laterals that still fit21,80521,389 two-mile equivalents
Units with room5,780of 10,572 Bakken spacing units
Units already at their neighbourhood's density3,551no lateral added
Resting on a county- or basin-wide density5,220laterals in 1,015 units with no developed neighbourhood within 20 miles (drawn lighter on the map)
In units with no surveyed well yet10,068laterals in 1,704 units that hold no surveyed Bakken-system well; whether they are ever drilled depends on leasing and economics this page does not model
Existing surveyed laterals20,704Bakken-system wells the candidates are packed around

Two-mile laterals make up 19,349 of the 21,805 candidates; 895 are three-mile and 551 four-mile pieces, and 1,010 are shorter than a mile and a half because the unit is. Overlapping spacing units are not additive: land is counted once, smallest unit first, so a unit that lies under a larger one shows only what the larger unit left. A further 4,364 laterals would fit the density but not the spacing rule and are counted, not drawn.

Where the room is

Map of western North Dakota by county. Grey lines are the existing surveyed laterals; blue lines are the candidate laterals that still fit, dense across McKenzie, Dunn, Williams, Mountrail and Divide counties and lighter blue where the target density comes from a county- or basin-wide value, mainly Mercer, Stark and the fringes.
  • Candidate lateral, target from a neighbourhood of developed units within 10 or 20 miles
  • Candidate lateral, target from the county or basin value (no such neighbourhood)
  • Existing surveyed lateral
  • County line (U.S. Census TIGERweb)

Every candidate is a two-point line inside one NDIC spacing unit, placed along the direction of the laterals already there. Open the image for the full resolution, or see the same set in the 3D viewer under “Projected wells”; every spacing-unit page of the well index carries its own count.

How the count is made

  1. The units. Every drilling spacing unit in the DMR footprint layer whose reported formation is Bakken, with its acreage measured on the map (EPSG:5070): 10,572 units.
  2. What is already drilled. The surveyed laterals of Bakken-system wells (wells whose Well Index pools name a non-Bakken pool are left out; blank or confidential pools are kept as unknown), by the feet of lateral inside each unit; a well is present in a unit with at least 660 ft inside it. Footage is expressed in two-mile equivalents (10,560 ft = one).
  3. The local ceiling. Mature units (three or more wells and no spud for three years) show what a neighbourhood has actually drilled: its achieved density in two-mile equivalents per 1,280 acres. The target for a unit is the larger of the 75th percentile of the mature units within 10 miles and the median of the units with four or more wells that received a spud in the last three years, in the same neighbourhood. At least eight reference units must lie within 10 miles; otherwise 20 miles, otherwise the county, otherwise the basin as a whole. The county and basin stand-ins are flagged on the map and in every table.
  4. Room per unit. Target density × eligible acres / 1,280, less the two-mile equivalents already in the unit and less any candidate footage a smaller overlapping unit has already placed on the same land, divided by the unit's own lateral length and rounded to a whole lateral. Units are processed smallest first, so land is counted once.
  5. Placement. New laterals run in the direction of the laterals already in the unit (aligned to the unit's sides when within 20 degrees; the long axis of an empty elongated unit; the nearby laterals for an empty square one). They go into the widest gaps between the existing laterals so that the smallest spacing is as large as possible, and never closer to a neighbour than the larger of 330 ft and 0.6 of the unit's natural spacing at the target. Setbacks are 250 ft from the unit ends (existing laterals stop a median 233 ft from them) and 500 ft from the sides, 250 ft where units overlap. A lateral is at least 5,000 ft; pieces longer than four miles are split.
  6. Order headroom is read separately from the latest signed NDIC order linked to each unit: wells allowed, less the surveyed Bakken wells assigned exclusively to the unit, less pending permits by surface location. These facts are extracted from the orders' operative text by machine and are not human-reviewed.

Why the 75th percentile

The first version of this method used the neighbourhood median as the ceiling. Run as of October 2023 and checked against the three years of drilling that followed, that ceiling was exceeded by 61 percent of the units that were drilled. The target used here was chosen among eight candidates on that same hindcast, so the figures that follow are in-sample and flatter it somewhat. 18 percent of the drilled units ended above it, and the drilled units ended at a median 0.80 of it. It flagged 8,900 units as having room: 20.1 percent of those received a new lateral in the three years, against 5.9 percent of the units it did not flag, so a flagged unit was 3.4 times as likely to be drilled. As a ranking of which units get drilled it scores an AUC of 0.67, where 0.5 is no better than chance and 1.0 is perfect. Because it flags most units, nearly every new lateral fell in a flagged unit; that share reflects how many units are flagged more than how accurate the ceiling is. The chart in the next section shows the values by county.

Both numbers

This count comes from a November 2026 study of the same question. The study also classed each unit by an economic horizon (which of these laterals would pay at a $55, $65 or $75 oil price) and applied 1,019 expert adjustments to individual units; with that screen and those adjustments it counted 14,324 candidate laterals, and 15,774 with the screen alone. This page removes both and counts 21,805. Most of the difference is the units the screen left out: those with fewer than 15 analog wells within 20 miles, and those it classed above $75. The economic horizon is not published yet. It will be recomputed from the Division's free monthly production reports, the source behind the well index's production panels, and added here when it is.

Density ceiling · hindcast as of October 2023

Where the ceiling comes from

For the counties with at least 20 units drilled between October 2023 and October 2026: the neighbourhood median that the first method used as a ceiling, the target used here, both as they stood in October 2023, and the median density those drilled units had reached by October 2026. Two-mile equivalents per 1,280 acres.

Density ceilings by countyDot plot. For each county, the neighbourhood median density of mature units as of October 2023, the target density this method uses, and the median density that the units drilled between October 2023 and October 2026 ended at. Two-mile equivalents per 1,280 acres. Values are in the table below the chart. Target density (75th percentile of mature units, or the recent-development median)Neighbourhood median, Oct 2023 (the earlier, lower ceiling)Where the units drilled since then ended, Oct 2026 (median)0246810Two-mile equivalents per 1,280 acresDunn (243 units)Dunn: neighbourhood median, October 2023: 3.7Dunn: target density as of October 2023: 8.8Dunn: median density the drilled units reached by October 2026: 7.07.0McKenzie (499 units)McKenzie: neighbourhood median, October 2023: 5.5McKenzie: target density as of October 2023: 8.1McKenzie: median density the drilled units reached by October 2026: 6.56.5Williams (543 units)Williams: neighbourhood median, October 2023: 4.7Williams: target density as of October 2023: 6.8Williams: median density the drilled units reached by October 2026: 4.84.8Mountrail (432 units)Mountrail: neighbourhood median, October 2023: 4.0Mountrail: target density as of October 2023: 6.6Mountrail: median density the drilled units reached by October 2026: 4.74.7Divide (106 units)Divide: neighbourhood median, October 2023: 1.3Divide: target density as of October 2023: 4.2Divide: median density the drilled units reached by October 2026: 2.92.9Billings (20 units)Billings: neighbourhood median, October 2023: 3.7Billings: target density as of October 2023: 5.6Billings: median density the drilled units reached by October 2026: 2.62.6Burke (44 units)Burke: neighbourhood median, October 2023: 2.8Burke: target density as of October 2023: 4.5Burke: median density the drilled units reached by October 2026: 2.02.0
The values as a table
Density ceiling hindcast by county (two-mile equivalents per 1,280 acres)
CountyUnits drilled Oct 2023 to Oct 2026Neighbourhood median, Oct 2023Target, Oct 2023Where they ended, Oct 2026 (median)
Dunn2433.78.87.0
McKenzie4995.58.16.5
Williams5434.76.84.8
Mountrail4324.06.64.7
Divide1061.34.22.9
Billings203.75.62.6
Burke442.84.52.0

Source: density-ceilings.json. Divide County drilled to roughly twice its 2023 neighbourhood median, which is why a median ceiling under-counted there.

By county

Room to drill by county

Eligible Bakken spacing units, how many still have room, the candidate laterals (and how many of them rest on a county- or basin-wide density), the existing surveyed laterals, and the density the mature units in the county have reached. Counties are ordered by candidate count.

Room to drill by county, November 2026 method
CountyEligible unitsUnits with roomCandidate lateralsof which county/basin targetTwo-mile eq.3- and 4-mileExisting lateralsMature unitsMature density, medianMature density, middle halfTarget density, median
Dunn1,5829454,6721,0574,5341733,7077386.93.7 to 9.39.1
McKenzie2,3711,1153,8174543,7883126,5791,2027.85.7 to 9.78.8
Williams2,0479712,93402,8821574,1619415.53.6 to 7.56.3
Mountrail1,9328092,19702,0931484,2701,0366.94.5 to 8.77.7
Divide8985611,76401,7972939361953.62.3 to 4.64.7
Mercer2022011,6661,3321,583030——8.6
Burke6454501,5806931,651264336732.21.0 to 4.63.8
Billings4233371,1221481,06835333562.81.6 to 3.54.2
Stark2381999859839460232762.92.8 to 4.75.6
McLean13010051405286452293.52.7 to 5.36.9
Golden Valley84754234233950350——5.6
Slope88656562020——8.6
Hettinger55424240000——8.6
Ward64242322070——5.0
Renville10000030——8.6

Mercer, Stark, Golden Valley, Slope and Hettinger have few or no mature Bakken units, so their targets are the county or basin value and their candidates are a geometric statement about unit size, not evidence that the rock supports that density. Density figures are two-mile equivalents per 1,280 eligible acres. Full table: by-county.json.

By township

The forty townships with the most room

Candidate laterals by PLSS township (township north, range west). Every township with an eligible unit is in by-township.json (440 townships); each township also has a page on the well index.

Townships by candidate laterals, top 40
TownshipCountyEligible unitsUnits with roomCandidate lateralsTwo-mile eq.
T141N R91WDunn1818180172
T142N R91WDunn1818180171
T141N R89WMercer1818162154
T141N R90WMercer1818162154
T142N R89WMercer1818162154
T143N R89WMercer1818161153
T144N R89WMercer1818160152
T144N R92WDunn1818159151
T142N R90WMercer1919156147
T144N R90WMercer1818156148
T141N R92WDunn1818152145
T143N R91WDunn1818147140
T141N R93WDunn1818144137
T146N R90WMercer1818143136
T145N R89WMercer1818142135
T141N R94WDunn1818139132
T146N R92WDunn2018136129
T147N R98WMcKenzie3120130126
T145N R90WMercer1818129123
T145N R92WDunn1515127121
T144N R91WDunn1818126120
T142N R92WDunn1818124118
T143N R93WDunn1818124122
T150N R88WMcLean1818124118
T151N R88WMountrail1818122116
T149N R89WMcLean1818121115
T147N R92WDunn3828118111
T146N R89WMercer1818115110
T145N R93WDunn2617113108
T146N R97WDunn3018111105
T141N R95WDunn1818110105
T146N R98WMcKenzie1816110110
T147N R97WDunn3325110105
T152N R88WMountrail1818107104
T139N R95WStark1818106101
T145N R104WMcKenzie181310499
T148N R98WMcKenzie261710499
T153N R88WMountrail181810398
T145N R96WDunn341910295
T146N R100WMcKenzie191810297

NDIC orders · signed through October 21, 2026

Order headroom by county

A different measure of room: what the Commission's orders allow. For every unit with a single stated well allowance in its latest linked order, the wells allowed, the surveyed Bakken wells assigned exclusively to the unit, the pending permits by surface location, and the headroom that remains. Headroom is regulatory room, not a drillable location; a unit can be over its allowance where orders have since changed or wells are shared.

Stated allowances against assigned wells and pending permits, by county
CountyUnits with an allowanceWells allowedAssignedPending permitsHeadroom (positive)After pendingUnits with room for 2+Units over their allowance
McKenzie1,77810,6385,7583285,2935,102922131
Williams1,4858,1153,8773284,4844,33882384
Mountrail1,4557,2234,0131943,3153,23278659
Dunn1,0436,1393,1722493,2393,12363888
Divide7203,1768652052,3702,25939123
Burke3561,648278961,3711,3002111
Billings3301,270268521,0099832323
Stark1695272256305299843
McLean402364510192192201
Golden Valley65185189167161400
Mercer11100000
All counties7,44239,15818,5201,47721,74520,9894,147393

Allowances are facts extracted from the operative text of signed orders by the project's order pipeline, machine-extracted and not human-reviewed; the same figures appear on each spacing-unit page. Data: headroom-by-county.json.

By operator

Where the room sits, by operator

A spacing unit is attributed to an operator when every surveyed well present in it reports that operator, or an entity grouped under it (the grouping follows public acquisition records and is listed below). Units with wells of more than one operator are mixed; units with no surveyed well are unassigned, which means no well, not no owner: lease ownership is in no public layer used here. The table lists operators alphabetically with at least 30 candidate laterals or 150 wells of order headroom; every operator is in by-operator.json. These are public-record facts about where room remains, not a ranking and not a statement of anyone's plans.

Candidate laterals and order headroom by operator (alphabetical)
OperatorUnits attributedCandidate lateralsTwo-mile eq.3- and 4-mileUnits with an allowanceWells allowedAssignedPendingHeadroom (positive)After pendingUnits with room for 2+
Chesapeake Operating Inc.6333101110000
Chevron Corporation (6 reported names)554887844255582,9901,9641171,1341,105255
Chord Energy Corporation (5 reported names)1,6342,2312,140601,70910,1294,7522595,4455,3141,015
ConocoPhillips (5 reported names)42685481185452,9491,8441041,3471,300237
Continental Resources Inc.7381,1881,145547094,3282,158972,6572,623370
Cornerstone Natural Resources LLC295043152184161216815925
Devon Energy Corporation (4 reported names)549637621335433,1551,9521411,2341,181255
EOG Resources Inc. (3 reported names)468243212304682,052737311,3351,320290
ExxonMobil (2 reported names)259611578302761,643906126782711159
Formentera Operations LLC153282263261336442333643841683
Foundation Energy Management LLC70145130085307672424022374
Hunt Oil Company195319306172076052525536134277
Koda Resources Operating LLC67871043671277689720914145
Kraken Operating LLC (2 reported names)392477452213491,91699767929899193
Lime Rock Resources (3 reported names)18625824171921,20340317811798146
Murex Petroleum Corporation742192149804671442532330461
Murfin Drilling Company Inc.13393801472130595912
NP Resources LLC—000411581015715740
Petro-Hunt group (3 reported names)418669632253831,54569639864846205
Phoenix Operating LLC47354316143731127109607526119
Prima Exploration Inc.226867226115284888818
Rockport Energy Solutions LLC74138463410024244
Silver Hill Energy Operating LLC8012814250754731703232629758
Slawson Exploration Company Inc.18213812972301,00455917449435122
SOGC LLC27126122530170897838118
TXO Partners LP100308289087463111035235268
Valkyrie Operating LLC17494701184110737311
White Rock Oil Gas LLC4337280206215347449
Unassigned units (no surveyed well present)1,83110,06810,133861———————
Mixed units (more than one operator present)1,8961,4031,382111———————
Which reported operator names each row groups

Reported operator names from the DMR wells layer of October 17, 2026, grouped where a public acquisition or an alias is on record (the number of wells under each name in brackets).

Chevron Corporation
HESS BAKKEN INVESTMENTS II, LLC (2,909 wells); AMERADA HESS CORPORATION (723 wells); CHEVRON USA, INC. (95 wells); HESS CORPORATION (91 wells); HESS WATER SERVICES LLC (13 wells); HESS TIOGA GAS PLANT LLC (2 wells)
Chord Energy Corporation
WHITING OIL AND GAS CORPORATION (2,535 wells); OASIS PETROLEUM NORTH AMERICA LLC (2,222 wells); ENERPLUS RESOURCES USA CORPORATION (1,357 wells); QEP ENERGY COMPANY (99 wells); WHITING PETROLEUM CORPORATION (12 wells)
ConocoPhillips
BURLINGTON RESOURCES OIL & GAS COMPANY LP (1,432 wells); MARATHON OIL COMPANY (1,328 wells); CONOCO INC. (129 wells); BURLINGTON RESOURCES OIL & GAS COMPANY (97 wells); PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY (27 wells)
Devon Energy Corporation
DEVON ENERGY WILLISTON, L.L.C. (2,355 wells); STATOIL OIL & GAS LP (57 wells); RIM OPERATING, INC. (54 wells); DEVON ENERGY PRODUCTION COMPANY, L.P. (3 wells)
EOG Resources Inc.
EOG RESOURCES, INC. (1,291 wells); EOG (NEW MEXICO) INC. (25 wells); EOG (OKLAHOMA) INC. (3 wells)
ExxonMobil
XTO ENERGY INC (1,406 wells); DENBURY ONSHORE, LLC (479 wells)
Kraken Operating LLC
KRAKEN OPERATING, LLC (981 wells); Zavanna Energy Operating, LLC (288 wells)
Lime Rock Resources
LIME ROCK RESOURCES III-A, L.P. (398 wells); LIME ROCK RESOURCES V-A, L.P. (83 wells); ABRAXAS PETROLEUM CORP. (45 wells)
Petro-Hunt group
PETRO-HUNT, L.L.C. (1,065 wells); PETRO-HUNT DAKOTA, LLC (179 wells); PETRO-HUNT CORP. (5 wells)

The longer-lateral trend

Laterals are getting longer

The room counted above assumes laterals the length of the unit. Operators are increasingly drilling three- and four-mile laterals, and the Commission is forming units shaped for them, which changes how the remaining land gets used: a three-mile lateral needs the next section along the azimuth, so two-mile units with open or same-operator acreage at their ends are the ones most likely to be redrawn.

Long-lateral growthTwo bar charts, 2015 to 2026: three- and four-mile laterals spudded per year, and spacing units shaped for three-mile-plus laterals by the year of their first linked order. Values are in the table below the chart. Three- and four-mile laterals spuddedSurveyed wells with 13,200 ft or more of lateral, by spud year01002003004002015: 6620152016: 2220162017: 3120172018: 7520182019: 5220192020: 2620202021: 3120212022: 8120222023: 19820232024: 28020242025: 33833820252026: 1221222026** 2026 to Oct 17Three-mile-plus spacing units formedFootprints three or four sections long, by first linked order (machine-read)01002003002015: 920152016: 1120162017: 2220172018: 2020182019: 1520192020: 1920202021: 3420212022: 5620222023: 9020232024: 12320242025: 17520252026: 2552552026** 2026 to Oct 21
The values as a table, and how the study counted
Long laterals by spud year and long units by first order year
Year3- and 4-mile laterals spuddedAll surveyed wells spuddedShare3-mile-plus units, first linked order
2015661,3275%9
2016225864%11
2017311,0233%22
2018751,2746%20
2019521,2414%15
2020264915%19
2021315476%34
2022818639%56
202319885923%90
202428091231%123
202533869049%175
2026*12215579%255

* 2026 is partial: wells to October 17, orders to October 21. A long lateral has at least 13,200 ft of surveyed lateral (the midpoint between nominal two- and three-mile lengths); a long unit has a footprint three or four sections long. The underlying study counted long laterals by their first production year, which comes from a production source this site does not publish; this page counts them by spud year from the free wells layer. Both series, where they overlap:

Definition change: spud year here against first-production year in the study
YearBy spud year (this page)By first production year (study)
20195263
20202624
20213136
20228153
2023198159
2024280258
2025338266
2026122163

Data: long-laterals.json.

What this count is not

Data and sources

Everything on this page is in these files, generated by the same run (JSON; the candidate set as GeoJSON lines in WGS84):

Sources: North Dakota Industrial Commission, Department of Mineral Resources, Oil and Gas Division: the public GIS downloads of October 17, 2026 (horizontal surveys, wells layer, drilling spacing units), the Well Index of October 28, 2026 (pools), and signed hearing orders through October 21, 2026 as read by this project's order pipeline. County lines: U.S. Census Bureau TIGERweb. The Division notes that its GIS information may be inaccurate or out of date and does not warrant it. No production data, no subscription content and no order document is used or redistributed here. The method is described on the methodology page; the same candidate set is drawn in the 3D viewer and counted on every spacing-unit page of the well index.